![]() ![]() For example in computer UI design we had flat, then went shapely, then went flat again. I don't really know about the dated look, though. Regardless, on the topic of drawing new users, if the users truly are "new", then any look will be unfamiliar to them, but yes, luring users over from competitors may be tricky. ![]() Well, if you were to ask me whether I think a group of teenagers is smarter than a chimpanzee. Signed: someone who still calls a tall building in Chicago as the Sears TowerĪh, I see. And until "Thunderbird for Android" is significantly differentiated in functionality (i.e., ignoring UI), it will remain branded in my mind as K9. I will continue to use Outlook until there is a significant justification to switch to Thunderbird. This would be a considerable (IMO) differentiation in functionality. I know I sound like a broken record but, at minimum, I believe Thunderbird could take quite a few users (who prefer privacy-focused apps) from both Google and Microsoft (not to mention 3rd-party apps ) by integrating functionality at the local level. I acknowledge it's your time/money but this does not make the app any more appealing. Little UI design changes are NOT what you should be spending time/money on they are a waste of effort given K9's already strong usability. ![]() One random guy's opinion (and a long-time K9 user): ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |